Updation: Dated 1/12/2015

1. In the case of DP, the counsel of respondent of DOPT halal Haider run away from the court when the turn has come and bench taken the serious view. The case is relisted on dated 22-12-2015.

2. In the case modify parity , the counsel of respondent of DOPT & DOT Harvinder Oberoi refused to receive the rejoinder in the court while our counsel showed the receive copy to the Hon. Pr judge and agreed. On the spot the copy of rejoinder handed over in the presence judge. Hon. Pr Judge and second senior judge commented when rule- 49 has already been abolished and asked to respondent counsel ,” what argument you want to give and very simple case the benefit is to be extended to the members of the PRPA”. The case is short relisted on dated 16-12-2015.

3. It is herewith requested to all members to be unite to acheive the all targets. You should be very much careful that some of the official or officer are trying to damage this mission of  legal fight of PRPA.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s